40 S&W
by Todd C 
, Friday, March 15, 2013, 23:39 (4216 days ago) @ Alfred John
When it first came out, I poopooed it. However, being a bit older and wiser, it's a really nice cartridge. Sarge summed it up pretty good. I can add that the 40 S&W is a ballistic duplicate of the original 38 WCF. When you look at it's track record since 1876 (?) well, what's not to like?
Complete thread:
- Questions on the S&W 40 caliber cartridges -
Alfred John,
2013-03-15, 13:08
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Questions on the S&W 40 caliber cartridges -
Sarge,
2013-03-15, 13:54
- Questions on the S&W 40 caliber cartridges -
Alfred John,
2013-03-15, 14:11
- 40 S&W - Todd C, 2013-03-15, 23:39
- Questions on the S&W 40 caliber cartridges -
Alfred John,
2013-03-15, 14:11
- I shoot more 165 grainers than 180s - stonewalrus, 2013-03-15, 14:16
- My wife and Daughter like their G23s and 27s... -
Rob Leahy,
2013-03-15, 15:00
- My wife and Daughter like their G23s and 27s... - Otony, 2013-03-15, 19:16
- My wife and Daughter like their G23s and 27s... - stonewalrus, 2013-03-15, 19:55
- Questions on the S&W 40 caliber cartridges - Slow Hand, 2013-03-15, 20:20
- evolution - bj, 2013-03-15, 22:22
- I've only fired one .40 S&W, a full-size M&P - FOG, 2013-03-17, 07:11
- Questions on the S&W 40 caliber cartridges -
Sarge,
2013-03-15, 13:54