I've got one one of the 1885's in 38-55
It's a Browning Traditional Hunter (I also have the same rifle in 30-30 and 45-70). Exceptional workmanship, an even as a REALLY picky engineer, I have no complaints about any of my 1885's. I just shoot it with cast bullets, and it is a SUPERB cast bullet rifle. The Traditional Hunter has a Marbles windage adjustable tang sight that is easy for my eyes to use. The rifles have a trigger that is actually quite good. I load it with Starline long 38-55 brass (2.125" long as opposed to the short Winchester brass..), 265 grain Lyman or RCBS cast bullets sized to .379" diameter (bore slugs .3785") and Accurate 2495br powder for a velocity of 1,450 fps. It is a very accurate rifle capable of MOA 3 shot groups, and is very comfortable to shoot as it probably weighs a little over 8 pounds in this configuration. It's my all time favorite cast bullet rifle.... Light recoil, accurate, and just plain classy and fun to shoot...
I've never had a missfire or any problem with any of my 1885's. They are as reliable as can be. I've never tried to push the cartridge at all, but it is a REALLY strong action and you could probably load it up to have a fair amount of power if that's what one wanted....
Wonderful rifle chambered in a wonderful cartridge... What more could you want?
Complete thread:
- ERSisk really does it... - 
Paul, 
2018-02-28, 17:24 
- I went Ruger #1S in .35 Whelen, a very handy gun, - 
former hater of plastic, 
2018-02-28, 18:13
- The 1885 is much better looking to my eye... - 
Paul, 
2018-03-01, 06:14
- That, it is, and possibly more accurate, - 
former hater of plastic, 
2018-03-01, 10:03
- PROBABLY more accurate.......nt - former hater of plastic, 2018-03-01, 10:37
 
 - Mic wrote an interesting article on one in .38-55 several... - 
Caz, 
2018-03-01, 10:50
- That is a great cartridge, and actually makes more sense - former hater of plastic, 2018-03-01, 15:05
 - I've got one one of the 1885's in 38-55 - 
JD, 
2018-03-01, 15:05
- for you to sell it to me?.....nt - 
former hater of plastic, 
2018-03-01, 15:11
- Sorry, I like it...  A LOT... - 
JD, 
2018-03-01, 16:41
- As someone who has owned 38-55s, I agree, - 
former hater of plastic, 
2018-03-01, 17:12
- You could always go .375 Win. - 
Wildcat, 
2018-03-01, 17:55
- Had one of those, too, but - former hater of plastic, 2018-03-01, 19:18
 
 
 - You could always go .375 Win. - 
Wildcat, 
2018-03-01, 17:55
 
 - As someone who has owned 38-55s, I agree, - 
former hater of plastic, 
2018-03-01, 17:12
 
 - Sorry, I like it...  A LOT... - 
JD, 
2018-03-01, 16:41
 
 - for you to sell it to me?.....nt - 
former hater of plastic, 
2018-03-01, 15:11
 
 
 - That, it is, and possibly more accurate, - 
former hater of plastic, 
2018-03-01, 10:03
 
 - The 1885 is much better looking to my eye... - 
Paul, 
2018-03-01, 06:14
 
 - I went Ruger #1S in .35 Whelen, a very handy gun, - 
former hater of plastic, 
2018-02-28, 18:13