PROBABLY more accurate.......nt
nt
Complete thread:
- ERSisk really does it... -
Paul,
2018-02-28, 17:24
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- I went Ruger #1S in .35 Whelen, a very handy gun, -
former hater of plastic,
2018-02-28, 18:13
- The 1885 is much better looking to my eye... -
Paul,
2018-03-01, 06:14
- That, it is, and possibly more accurate, -
former hater of plastic,
2018-03-01, 10:03
- PROBABLY more accurate.......nt - former hater of plastic, 2018-03-01, 10:37
- Mic wrote an interesting article on one in .38-55 several... -
Caz,
2018-03-01, 10:50
- That is a great cartridge, and actually makes more sense - former hater of plastic, 2018-03-01, 15:05
- I've got one one of the 1885's in 38-55 -
JD,
2018-03-01, 15:05
- for you to sell it to me?.....nt -
former hater of plastic,
2018-03-01, 15:11
- Sorry, I like it... A LOT... -
JD,
2018-03-01, 16:41
- As someone who has owned 38-55s, I agree, -
former hater of plastic,
2018-03-01, 17:12
- You could always go .375 Win. -
Wildcat,
2018-03-01, 17:55
- Had one of those, too, but - former hater of plastic, 2018-03-01, 19:18
- You could always go .375 Win. -
Wildcat,
2018-03-01, 17:55
- As someone who has owned 38-55s, I agree, -
former hater of plastic,
2018-03-01, 17:12
- Sorry, I like it... A LOT... -
JD,
2018-03-01, 16:41
- for you to sell it to me?.....nt -
former hater of plastic,
2018-03-01, 15:11
- That, it is, and possibly more accurate, -
former hater of plastic,
2018-03-01, 10:03
- The 1885 is much better looking to my eye... -
Paul,
2018-03-01, 06:14
- I went Ruger #1S in .35 Whelen, a very handy gun, -
former hater of plastic,
2018-02-28, 18:13