I did not doubt the accuracy.
by Hoot 
, Diversityville, Liberal-sota, Wednesday, October 26, 2016, 12:23 (2952 days ago) @ ~JM~
I just wanted to know the source before passing it on. 'Net commandos (on both sides) are free to write what they want. Once it gets passed around enough, it becomes "truth".
My experience has been that D'souza has his facts correct before writing or speaking.
Some of what I read above was known but some was new information.
Complete thread:
- how would you spread the word? -
bj,
2016-10-23, 19:38
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Found This A Couple Of Weeks Ago... -
~JM~,
2016-10-23, 22:22
- Had To Modify A Word. -
~JM~,
2016-10-23, 22:24
- You are correct. Nothing personal, just anti-spammers. -
Miles,
2016-10-23, 23:33
- I Figured It Was Probably An Anti-Spam Feature. Thanks. (NT) - ~JM~, 2016-10-24, 08:40
- You are correct. Nothing personal, just anti-spammers. -
Miles,
2016-10-23, 23:33
- Some new information there. -
Hoot,
2016-10-26, 05:24
- Source... -
Paul,
2016-10-26, 07:28
- Thanks Paul. -
Hoot,
2016-10-26, 07:39
- Article Above ? -
~JM~,
2016-10-26, 11:45
- I did not doubt the accuracy. -
Hoot,
2016-10-26, 12:23
- I did not doubt the accuracy. -
~JM~,
2016-10-26, 12:48
- "...difficult & time consuming..." Amen! - Hoot, 2016-10-26, 13:24
- I did not doubt the accuracy. -
~JM~,
2016-10-26, 12:48
- I did not doubt the accuracy. -
Hoot,
2016-10-26, 12:23
- Article Above ? -
~JM~,
2016-10-26, 11:45
- Thanks Paul. -
Hoot,
2016-10-26, 07:39
- Source... -
Paul,
2016-10-26, 07:28
- Had To Modify A Word. -
~JM~,
2016-10-23, 22:24
- Found This A Couple Of Weeks Ago... -
~JM~,
2016-10-23, 22:22