.22 mag ammo - a lot less weight and space
In a scenario where weight and space were issues, I could see someone making an argument for how many more rounds of .22 Mag could be carried versus 9mm (or just about any other cartridge) for weight and space. You can carry a couple hundred rounds of .22 Mag in a couple vest pockets and not even notice it. I can imagine a few scenarios where it might be advantageous, but neither the Glock 17 nor the PMR 30 would be on my list of go-to handguns for such scenarios.
Complete thread:
- For the sake of conversation: PMR30 vs Glock 17 -
Byron,
2014-09-30, 08:37
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- While I'm not a Glock "fanboy" by any means... - cas, 2014-09-30, 08:57
- Generally agree... -
Sarge,
2014-09-30, 09:53
- G-17 hands down -
MR,
2014-09-30, 10:27
- Practical sidearm for an outdoorsman.... -
Byron,
2014-09-30, 16:22
- Practical sidearm for an outdoorsman.... - MR, 2014-10-02, 10:52
- Practical sidearm for an outdoorsman.... -
Byron,
2014-09-30, 16:22
- I did that to a Gen3 19... - rob, 2014-10-02, 22:08
- G-17 hands down -
MR,
2014-09-30, 10:27
- .22 mag ammo - a lot less weight and space - cubrock, 2014-09-30, 17:37
- In the current environment I take the 9mm 10 times out of 10 -
mcassill,
2014-09-30, 20:12
- Exactly right, and... - rob, 2014-10-02, 15:03
- For the sake of conversation: PMR30 vs Glock 17 - Bob Hatfield, 2014-10-01, 03:43