they were "perfect" for 50 years...
by Rob Leahy 
, Prescott, Arizona, Monday, August 26, 2013, 09:53 (4051 days ago) @ stonewalrus
Just enough to use but rugged and snag free enough to stand up to the rigors of combat.
many of us mananged to qualify expert with those "Lousy sights"
--
Of the Troops & For the Troops
Complete thread:
- Unfired no more -
RidinLou,
2013-08-25, 17:26
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- I have never understood great pistol designs with -
stonewalrus,
2013-08-25, 17:56
- I have never understood great pistol designs with - SIXGUNNER, 2013-08-25, 18:51
- they were "perfect" for 50 years... -
Rob Leahy,
2013-08-26, 09:53
- And just how old were your eyes...... -
Otony,
2013-08-26, 17:36
- 18 to 21, just like the majority of GIs that JMB anticipated - Rob Leahy, 2013-08-26, 21:07
- And just how old were your eyes...... -
Otony,
2013-08-26, 17:36
- Rear sight is OK, But - RidinLou, 2013-08-25, 19:55
- See, it's already started.... -
Catoosa,
2013-08-25, 20:43
- See, it's already started.... - RidinLou, 2013-08-27, 21:39
- Unfired no more - Catoosa, 2013-08-25, 20:45
- 1911 ergonomics... -
rob,
2013-08-26, 22:38
- Stone vs. File -
FOG,
2013-08-26, 23:26
- Nice! - rob, 2013-08-27, 07:26
- Stone vs. File -
FOG,
2013-08-26, 23:26
- I have never understood great pistol designs with -
stonewalrus,
2013-08-25, 17:56