The one thing that really tempts me with a .41 Magnum is...
by rob 
, Saturday, August 24, 2013, 08:37 (4053 days ago) @ Bud
That a 240-260 grain bullet is heavy for caliber and, like you mentioned, the heavy for caliber bullets always seem to be much more accurate in every handgun I've owned. They also have better sectional density giving better penetration. So, a 245-260 bullet in a .41 at 1200 fps has about the same recoil as a standard 240g .44 load but with a .44, to get the same heavy for caliber bullet you need to go to the 300g class. As I get older I like to lift heavier weights and shoot milder guns:)
Complete thread:
- 41 magnum history and information request..... -
Alfred John,
2013-08-21, 17:43
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- A 'good' .41 Magnum reference -
FOG,
2013-08-21, 18:42
- A 'good' .41 Magnum reference -
Bud,
2013-08-21, 19:13
- The one thing that really tempts me with a .41 Magnum is... - rob, 2013-08-24, 08:37
- A 'good' .41 Magnum reference -
Bud,
2013-08-21, 19:13
- Yes Remington made a 210 LSWC reduced load. -
Rob Leahy,
2013-08-21, 23:09
- Gun Notes, volume 1 (I think) has a treasure trove -
brionic,
2013-08-21, 23:55
- Not sure, but I did give mine... - FOG, 2013-08-22, 00:10
- Yes Remington made a 210 LSWC reduced load. - Lee J., 2013-08-23, 22:05
- Gun Notes, volume 1 (I think) has a treasure trove -
brionic,
2013-08-21, 23:55
- 41 magnum history and information request..... - Alfred John, 2013-08-22, 07:42
- 41 magnum history and information request..... - Remington40x, 2013-08-22, 09:10
- If we're going to drift to load data... -
Hobie,
2013-08-22, 10:52
- Handloader ran an article about downloaded .41 - brionic, 2013-08-22, 20:10
- A 'good' .41 Magnum reference -
FOG,
2013-08-21, 18:42