That looks promising
In particular, no apparent 'waist' at the base of the bullet. Looks like about the right seating depth, too.
I suppose if I had one 'worry', it would be the bullet weight (bearing length). I know Elmer Keith got away with it, but I have to wonder if the 1917 twist will stabilze that bullet unless it's loaded up there a ways.
I suppose you'll find out soon enough.
Good Luck! 
--
![[image]](http://www.sixshootercommunity.com/share/awkward.gif)
Complete thread:
- Experimenting with old sixguns..... -
Glen,
2013-04-14, 19:51
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Here's hoping the Keith bullet works better -
FOG,
2013-04-15, 06:04
- Dave, I am loading the Keith SWC..... -
Glen,
2013-04-15, 09:12
- That looks promising -
FOG,
2013-04-15, 11:05
- I queried Hamilton on the subject of twist.... -
Glen,
2013-04-15, 11:30
- Cool beans! - FOG, 2013-04-15, 11:36
- I queried Hamilton on the subject of twist.... -
Glen,
2013-04-15, 11:30
- A few more M25-2 notes from the old days - FOG, 2013-04-15, 11:24
- That looks promising -
FOG,
2013-04-15, 11:05
- Dave, I am loading the Keith SWC..... -
Glen,
2013-04-15, 09:12
- A few more general ideas -
FOG,
2013-04-15, 06:48
- Being a simple man w/simple ideas -
Bud,
2013-04-15, 08:23
- I dunno, sounds kinda complicated to me... -
FOG,
2013-04-15, 08:46
- I dunno, sounds kinda complicated to me... - Bud, 2013-04-16, 08:54
- I dunno, sounds kinda complicated to me... -
FOG,
2013-04-15, 08:46
- Being a simple man w/simple ideas -
Bud,
2013-04-15, 08:23
- Here's hoping the Keith bullet works better -
FOG,
2013-04-15, 06:04