I'm definitely not a member because of the magazine
Well I am glad I was not the only one. I held it out and read it first . What a waste of two pages. read the article learned nothing and couldn't agree with what was said. Yes a 357 will kill deer but more deer were lost with 357's in Pa in the 80's than any other caliber, NEW bullets will make it better but a 125 wouldn't be my first choice in a 357 and that is what the thought of the day was. Then useing pistol bullets in RIFLES turned a fair bullet into a varmit bullet crippleing up deer. My thoughts the bigger the better the tighter the sweater. 
Complete thread:
- Interesting Article in American Hunter---Not -
Drago,
2012-09-26, 20:16
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Interesting Article in American Hunter---Not -
Frank S,
2012-09-27, 11:37
- I'm definitely not a member because of the magazine -
stonewalrus,
2012-09-27, 14:24
- I'm definitely not a member because of the magazine - uncowboy, 2012-09-27, 17:41
- I'm definitely not a member because of the magazine -
stonewalrus,
2012-09-27, 14:24
- Interesting Article in American Hunter---Not -
Frank S,
2012-09-27, 11:37