Ammo? Wouldn't that be dangerous?
by brionic 
, Thursday, September 13, 2012, 14:10 (4401 days ago) @ Rob Leahy
xx
Complete thread:
- No ammo for Emabssy guards in Eqypt... -
Rob Leahy,
2012-09-13, 13:33
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Ammo? Wouldn't that be dangerous? -
brionic,
2012-09-13, 14:10
- please tell me that is not true?!? -
cable,
2012-09-13, 14:26
- freebeacon article -
Rob Leahy,
2012-09-13, 14:54
- Also reported on the radio - Cherokee, 2012-09-13, 16:54
- freebeacon article -
Rob Leahy,
2012-09-13, 14:54
- Ammo? Wouldn't that be dangerous? -
Alfred John,
2012-09-13, 18:38
- Ammo? Wouldn't that be dangerous? -
Catoosa,
2012-09-13, 22:41
- Ammo? Wouldn't that be dangerous? - Slow Hand, 2012-09-14, 04:10
- After the Marine Barracks bombing in Beirut, the Army got - Rob Leahy, 2012-09-14, 00:32
- Ammo? Wouldn't that be dangerous? -
Catoosa,
2012-09-13, 22:41
- please tell me that is not true?!? -
cable,
2012-09-13, 14:26
- Hoplophobes R Us - the Obamination wouldn't want - stonewalrus, 2012-09-13, 17:03
- No ammo for Emabssy guards in Eqypt... -
Jhenry,
2012-09-13, 17:31
- They should use the idiot ambassador as a shield - stonewalrus, 2012-09-13, 17:34
- Ammo? Wouldn't that be dangerous? -
brionic,
2012-09-13, 14:10