1917 cylinders were a bit short.
I'm betting that's why. Looks like really nice work on somebody's part.
Complete thread:
- Different. -
Hoot,
2017-02-28, 07:52
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Different. -
Cherokee,
2017-02-28, 09:45
- Very interesting... -
Brian A,
2017-02-28, 12:03
- My thought as well Brian. -
Hoot,
2017-03-01, 08:04
- From the pictures it looks like... -
mcassill,
2017-03-02, 04:56
- That's what I see too Mark. -
Hoot,
2017-03-02, 06:41
- That's what I see too Mark. -
Brian A,
2017-03-02, 06:53
- 1917 cylinders were a bit short. -
mcassill,
2017-03-02, 09:56
- Yep. Forgot that bit. - Hoot, 2017-03-02, 12:25
- 1917 cylinders were a bit short. -
mcassill,
2017-03-02, 09:56
- That's what I see too Mark. -
Brian A,
2017-03-02, 06:53
- That's what I see too Mark. -
Hoot,
2017-03-02, 06:41
- From the pictures it looks like... -
mcassill,
2017-03-02, 04:56
- My thought as well Brian. -
Hoot,
2017-03-01, 08:04
- Very interesting... -
Brian A,
2017-02-28, 12:03
- Different. -
Cherokee,
2017-02-28, 09:45