Some may find this interesting
by mcassill, Tuesday, December 20, 2016, 05:34 (2897 days ago)
http://soldiersystems.net/2016/12/19/usmc-authorizes-gen-iii-pmag-for-m27/#comment-900184
I wish I had stock in Magpul. Note that they are authorizing the Army's new mag "for training use only"
The caption seems to condradict the article "
by Rob Leahy , Prescott, Arizona, Wednesday, December 21, 2016, 22:46 (2896 days ago) @ mcassill
Earlier today, at 191737Z, the USMC issued a message entitled, “M4/M16 SERIES/M27 MAGAZINE GUIDANCE UPDATE”, directing which magazines will be used by Marines with the M4/M16, M27 and M249.
In addition to the Army’s new Enhanced Performance Magazines (NSN 1005-01- 630-9508) which will replace the legacy magazine in the stock system, PM Individual Weapon Systems also authorizes the GEN M3 PMAG in Black (NSN 1005-01-615-5169) and the new Medium Coyote Tan (NSN 1005-01-659-7086). Of note, the Army’s EPM is authorized for training use only!"
"Not only that, it’s the only magazine authorized for use in combat."
--
Of the Troops & For the Troops
The caption seems to condradict the article "
by mcassill, Thursday, December 22, 2016, 08:38 (2895 days ago) @ Rob Leahy
"AUTHORIZATION TO USE THE EPM FOR TRAINING USE ONLY WITH THE M4, M4A1, M16A4, AND M27 REMAINS THE SAME. "
Background on the EPM
by mcassill, Thursday, December 22, 2016, 08:45 (2895 days ago) @ mcassill
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/07/26/us-army-introduces-new-enhanced-performan...
Picture in the article shows the various magazines it is supposed to replace. The green follower mag is the one we were using in 2007. Takeaway from all this: Army Ordinance spent years developing a better magazine, which apparently doesn't work as well as a commercial off-the-shelf item that already existed. There's a broader lesson there that those who worship at the altar of government refuse to learn.