That Glurkn is no better or worse that the first LC9. the s

by Rob Leahy , Prescott, Arizona, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 20:14 (3415 days ago) @ Fowler

I Prefer American made guns and the striker fired SR9 is better. Not being made by the total and complete ass Gaston Glurk makes the SR(, S&W Shield the Kahr or even the XDs far ahead on my list of that sort of gun.

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops

Post reply

770 views

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

New Ruger LCP Custom - Art, 2015-05-19, 18:37
- New Ruger LCP Custom - Jared, 2015-05-19, 23:14
  - New Ruger LCP Custom - Fowler, 2015-05-20, 09:16
    - New Ruger LCP Custom - Jared, 2015-05-20, 10:13
      - Dad has had one of the originals for a while - StoneWolf, 2015-05-20, 13:10
        
        it basically doesn't have sights! They are awful. Ended up - stonewalrus, 2015-05-20, 13:18
        
        They WERE that way. No longer. Besides they are meant to rub - Rob Leahy, 2015-05-20, 17:51
        
        All the more reason to shoot a snubbie - Fowler, 2015-05-20, 18:52
        
        That Glurkn is no better or worse that the first LC9. the s - Rob Leahy, 2015-05-20, 20:14
        
        Rob, you have to quit beating around the bush and....... - Hoot, 2015-05-20, 21:01
        
        The Kahr is 30n years AHEAD of - Rob Leahy, 2015-05-21, 14:01
        
        That Glurkn is no better or worse that the first LC9. the s - Jared, 2015-05-20, 21:59
        
        to each their own I guess, I hit very well with my G27 and - StoneWolf, 2015-05-21, 06:03
        
        But it wasn't minute of Coke can at 10 yards... - stonewalrus, 2015-05-21, 05:18
- I've owned several of both iterations. the second/current - Rob Leahy, 2015-05-20, 13:09

The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board

That Glurkn is no better or worse that the first LC9. the s