I was thinking it was about that timeframe
by bj 
, Tuesday, May 19, 2015, 19:46 (3416 days ago) @ JLF
They were so incredibly ugly, that probably limited their appeal. The 396 is much more interesting looking, although I do understand the usefulness of the shrouded hammer.
Complete thread:
- Apparently I haven't been paying attention. -
Hoot,
2015-05-19, 06:27
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Next question is why? I know it's not a magnum but that's -
StoneWolf,
2015-05-19, 07:58
- "why?" Uhhhh......well, a few things come to mind. -
Hoot,
2015-05-20, 08:37
- As long as it isn't a high dollar bullet puller... - stonewalrus, 2015-05-21, 15:19
- "why?" Uhhhh......well, a few things come to mind. -
Hoot,
2015-05-20, 08:37
- I don't believe they are... - Brian A, 2015-05-19, 08:01
- Apparently I haven't been paying attention. -
SIXGUNNER,
2015-05-19, 08:36
- I haven't seen one of those in a few years. -
MR,
2015-05-19, 09:45
- I thought Charter Arms 44 Bulldogs were bad enough... -
stonewalrus,
2015-05-19, 14:03
- If one does not try to magnamize them a Bulldog is a good -
Rob Leahy,
2015-05-19, 18:18
- I have a couple of those laying around. - Andrew, 2015-05-19, 20:03
- I have only fired one and maybe it was the gun or load - stonewalrus, 2015-05-19, 21:41
- If one does not try to magnamize them a Bulldog is a good -
Rob Leahy,
2015-05-19, 18:18
- I thought Charter Arms 44 Bulldogs were bad enough... -
stonewalrus,
2015-05-19, 14:03
- Thank you Sir. - Hoot, 2015-05-20, 08:34
- I haven't seen one of those in a few years. -
MR,
2015-05-19, 09:45
- 296. -
JLF,
2015-05-19, 11:42
- 296. - Frank S, 2015-05-19, 18:05
- I was thinking it was about that timeframe - bj, 2015-05-19, 19:46
- Next question is why? I know it's not a magnum but that's -
StoneWolf,
2015-05-19, 07:58