Did NOT take it as a negative on me but as
by Hobie 
, Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, Thursday, September 04, 2014, 12:50 (3674 days ago) @ Catoosa
something as to your point that I didn't understand. I wanted to understand so that I could answer any questions or correct any misconceptions if possible/applicable.
As noted elsewhere the bluing has been substantially removed but it has not been cold-blued. I think the color/tint/hue of the photo gives that impression but it isn't so. This pistol could easily be given a correct finish and would be a fine shooter. I was thinking of having it Parkerized like a military gun... #duckingandrunning
--
Sincerely,
Hobie
Complete thread:
- Colt 1903 on Gunbroker -
Hobie_,
2014-09-02, 10:02
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Colt 1903 on Gunbroker - Jared, 2014-09-02, 21:02
- Colt 1903 on Gunbroker -
Catoosa,
2014-09-02, 21:39
- What exactly do you mean by "BS"? -
Hobie,
2014-09-03, 18:37
- What exactly do you mean by "BS"? -
Catoosa,
2014-09-03, 22:44
- Did NOT take it as a negative on me but as -
Hobie,
2014-09-04, 12:50
- I think that would be a neat little critter - Catoosa, 2014-09-04, 21:39
- Did NOT take it as a negative on me but as -
Hobie,
2014-09-04, 12:50
- What exactly do you mean by "BS"? -
Catoosa,
2014-09-03, 22:44
- What exactly do you mean by "BS"? -
Hobie,
2014-09-03, 18:37
- The photo seems to be off color to me, on my - Hobie, 2014-09-03, 18:44