Some chronograph results from this morning...
by rob , Saturday, November 30, 2013, 19:23 (4016 days ago)
edited by Miles Fortis, Saturday, November 30, 2013, 20:36
Sideways images...
by rob , Saturday, November 30, 2013, 19:25 (4016 days ago) @ rob
Not sure why they uploaded sideways but it's still readable:)
I rotated them for you.
by Miles Fortis , CIVITATES AMERICAE, Saturday, November 30, 2013, 20:37 (4016 days ago) @ rob
xx
Awesome, thank you! NM
by rob , Saturday, November 30, 2013, 21:19 (4016 days ago) @ Miles Fortis
.
Some chronograph results from this morning...
by Cherokee , Medina, Ohio, Saturday, November 30, 2013, 19:42 (4016 days ago) @ rob
Always interesting to see how the loads chronograph in your own guns and how that compares to others' data. Barrell length does make a difference. Just for comparison sake, here is some of my data from back in the late 1980's:
357 Mag - 356158 @ 14.0/2400
..Ruger 10" 1467
..Ruger 6" 1404
..Python 8" 1434
44 Mag - 429421 @ 10.0/Unique..Redhawk 7" 1157
44 Mag - 429421 @ 21.0/2400..Redhawk 7" 1472
Some chronograph results from this morning...
by Jared, Saturday, November 30, 2013, 21:03 (4016 days ago) @ Cherokee
A tight BC gap helps too. My 5.5" TLA will out run both my 7.5" SBH and 8 3/8" S&W by 50 to 100 FPS.
I would have to look at my notes but 10.0 gr Unique breaks 1200 and 21.0 gr 2400 is nipping on 1500 FPS.
That's pretty good!
by rob , Saturday, November 30, 2013, 21:36 (4016 days ago) @ Jared
Tight chambers make a huge difference as well.
Some chronograph results from this morning...
by Jared, Saturday, November 30, 2013, 21:08 (4016 days ago) @ rob
It always amazed me how hard you have to run a .357 out of a 4-5" barrel to break 1200-1250 FPS with a 158gr bullet. Where .44 will do it from a 4" with out much trouble with a 250gr. For me the .357 gets to be unpleasant to shoot when I really start to stand on it. I just don't like the blast and snappy recoil.
Exactly!
by rob , Saturday, November 30, 2013, 21:30 (4016 days ago) @ Jared
Look what you get in a .44 Magnum with a 250 grain Keith bullet and10 grains Unique...1100+ fps, easy to shoot all day long and extremely accurate. The 21/2400 load is very accurate as well but you feel that extra 160-170 or so fps in the S&W. Not bad at all though in my 4 5/8" SBH. I'd carry a .44 over a .357 any day if it wasn't for the size difference. I still haven't settled on a .357 load that is a keeper...at least in this GP100 (my only current .357)...save for 4.5 grains unique over cast 158-160's in 38 cases. But I'd really like to find a good accurate 158 XTP full power magnum load (at least in the 1100 fps range) that is accurate for a carry load. The 16.7 is ok but not anything to get excited about. Still working on it though.
Exactly!
by Jared, Saturday, November 30, 2013, 22:05 (4016 days ago) @ rob
The way I look at it is 10.0gr of unique comes pretty close to the Keith load in a .44 special. I seldom shoot anything heavier through my S&Ws.
I looked at my notes and I was little off 21.0 gr 2400 and a Keith go around- 1450. And 10.0 unique was 1165.
With the 2400 load the TLA beat my 8 3/8" S&W by 82 FPS and with 20.0 gr WC820 it beat my 7.5 SBH by 35 FPS. With a MAG primer in the TLA jumped to 110FPS gain, but I didn't shoot that primer with the S&W . Or if I did I didn't record it.
WC820...
by rob , Saturday, November 30, 2013, 22:25 (4016 days ago) @ Jared
What kind of velocities are you getting from 20/WC820 and especially if you shoot it in other guns than the TLA since it would be higher than usual. I'm guessing you're talking about with a Keith bullet. I worked up to 20 or 20.5 grains with it and I'll have to look back and see but I think it was with XTP's rather than the Keith's. I didn't want to go further until I chronographed them and it's been on my to-do list ever since. I also think I was using standard primers at the time forgetting that I used WLP in my old .45 Colt loads with WC820. I need to start over with Keith bullets and WLP primers.
WC820...
by John K., Saturday, November 30, 2013, 22:28 (4016 days ago) @ rob
250gr Lyman 429421 WC820 21.0gr Federal LP Mag. S&W 629 8.375 1494fps 9/3/2001
Wow!
by rob , Saturday, November 30, 2013, 22:34 (4016 days ago) @ John K.
That's moving pretty good. My 20 or 20.5 grain load sure felt a lot milder than that but it was with a jacketed bullet and a 4 5/8" barrel. That is gonna be my next chronograph test starting at 20 grains and Keith bullets. It was extremely accurate in my .45 Bisley and I suspect it will be in the .44 as well. I sure have a lot of it!
Another tight gun. When I rebuilt it, I installed a ball
by John K., Saturday, November 30, 2013, 22:41 (4016 days ago) @ rob
lock, blueprinted everything and set the b/c gap at .0015". Too tight, really, as it will drag in less than 100rnds. But I wanted to see, so I saw.
WC820...
by Jared, Saturday, November 30, 2013, 23:31 (4016 days ago) @ rob
My lot of 820 was WAY slower that what most everyone else reports. It is very close to H110/296. To equal H110 velocity I only have to reduce the powder charge by about 3-5%. I went through a 8 # jug just working with loads in all the calibers I have that it is suitable for. I still have a jug or so left but wish I would have bought more.
That was a start load for working up with a Win primer. The 7.5" was going around 1215 FPS. In my TLA it was going 1240 FPS. I topped out at 23.0 and a CCI 550 for around 1400-1450 out of my TLA. ( depending on which brand of Keith bullet or a 429244) with 22.0gr CCI550 and the 429244 my TLA is really accurate. It shoots the Keith bullet quite well too but there is a slight edge with the gas check over 1400.
Interesting...I have two 8 pound jugs,
by rob , Saturday, November 30, 2013, 23:47 (4016 days ago) @ Jared
One probably has 5 pounds left and the other is unopened. I figure I'll start back at 20 grains and work up with the Keith bullets and the chronograph shooting for 1200-1250 fps. I really don't need anything more than the 10 grain Unique load but I have all that powder so I ought to use it. I may see how it does in the .357. It might give me a good magnum load and would certainly go farther and I may just stick with the Unique load in the .44.
Your lot is probably different,
by Jared, Sunday, December 01, 2013, 08:45 (4015 days ago) @ rob
1200-1250 with mine is on the bottom end of the usefulness of the powder. My ES was over 100. A mag primer and more powder brought that number into the 40s, but velocity is well above what you are looking for.
Ignition can be sporadic if you go too low. I stuck a bullet in my .500 Linebaugh 27.0 gr and a 450gr bullet. Velocity was about 1075 but one shot left the bullet in the forcing cone with a glob of charred powder behind it.
I like it in the smaller calibers like .327, .30 Carbine .357 it works great.
I think I'm gonna try it in the .357 first...
by rob , Sunday, December 01, 2013, 08:54 (4015 days ago) @ Jared
And if it works, reserve it for that. There really isn't much to gain in the .44 over 10/Unique and 21/2400 other than economy and I'm not sure we can replace the 820. I figure it will go farther in the .357.
I think I'm gonna try it in the .357 first...
by Jared, Sunday, December 01, 2013, 17:15 (4015 days ago) @ rob
I would give you the data I worked up but since my lot is so different it wouldn't do you much good. Mine does much prefer magnum primers.
I was using magnum primers...
by rob , Sunday, December 01, 2013, 23:39 (4015 days ago) @ Jared
in my .45 Colt load. 23 grains ran a 270 SAA almost 1250 fps. That was the most accurate load I ever ran through any of my .45 Colts.