Corporate isn't supporting G&A over its other firearms
by Hobie 
, Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, Wednesday, November 06, 2013, 19:56 (3978 days ago) @ Slow Hand
publications or even to equal them. I don't buy it, probably won't, despite years of subscribing.
So, I didn't read the Metcalf article, don't know what he wrote and, frankly, I don't care. If he is for any sort of compromise, he's a fool because the other side's idea of compromise is...
![[image]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8qI5PsRCPU0/Unp_ffbfc4I/AAAAAAAABNs/NQ36Y6lrDGM/s1600/compromise_v21.png)
--
Sincerely,
Hobie
Complete thread:
- Jim Bequette; editor of G&A re: Dick Metcalf -
Slow Hand,
2013-11-06, 18:27
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Jim Bequette; editor of G&A re: Dick Metcalf - Cherokee, 2013-11-06, 18:46
- Now there's a man with integrity -
Miles Fortis,
2013-11-06, 18:54
- Neither of them are getting hurt by this - anachronism, 2013-11-07, 08:45
- Good, but... -
rob,
2013-11-06, 19:49
- YES! - stonewalrus, 2013-11-06, 20:32
- Corporate isn't supporting G&A over its other firearms -
Hobie,
2013-11-06, 19:56
- Very nice.... - Brian A, 2013-11-07, 06:27
- This is good. -
mcassill,
2013-11-06, 21:35
- This is good. -
uncowboy,
2013-11-07, 06:33
- It was an experiment Ntxt - Bob Hatfield, 2013-11-08, 03:56
- This is good. -
uncowboy,
2013-11-07, 06:33