The Bisley hammer arrived. Brownells ships quick!
by Hobie 
, Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, Sunday, January 15, 2012, 08:19 (4644 days ago)
edited by Hobie, Sunday, January 15, 2012, 08:24
So I laid the original FT hammer up against the Bisley hammer and noticed that the vertical "shank" (I know there is a correct term for the part of the hammer that connects spur and nose with the part that is pierced by the pivot hole) is thicker front to back than the original. So, do folks thin this? Is their aesthetic ruined by the extra metal? Any other thoughts? It doesn't appear that Slow Hand has done this at all...
![[image]](images/uploaded/201201151423294f12e1612ddee.jpg)
--
Sincerely,
Hobie
Complete thread:
- The Bisley hammer arrived. Brownells ships quick! -
Hobie,
2012-01-15, 08:19
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- The Bisley hammer arrived. Brownells ships quick! -
Sarge,
2012-01-15, 08:53
- The Bisley hammer arrived. Brownells ships quick! -
Hobie,
2012-01-15, 10:07
- The 1st time I saw Skeeter's picture of a Bisley Hammer on -
Rob Leahy,
2012-01-15, 11:03
- I found a photo of a Bisley hammer spur grafted to a... - Hobie, 2012-01-15, 12:06
- My downfall was Bowen's book - Slow Hand, 2012-01-15, 15:48
- The 1st time I saw Skeeter's picture of a Bisley Hammer on -
Rob Leahy,
2012-01-15, 11:03
- The Bisley hammer arrived. Brownells ships quick! -
Hobie,
2012-01-15, 10:07
- Got mine yesterday... -
Slow Hand,
2012-01-15, 15:46
- Found an excellent photo on-line of, a Bowen job, of course. - Hobie, 2012-01-15, 15:53
- The Bisley hammer arrived. Brownells ships quick! -
Sarge,
2012-01-15, 08:53