And now, for something completely different...

by Hoot @, Diversityville, Liberal-sota, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 07:42 (4304 days ago)

It may, or may not, shoot well...

by Brian A, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 07:50 (4304 days ago) @ Hoot

But it sure does not have any eye appeal to my way of thinking.

Absolutely - and the octagonal barrel makes no sense at all

by stonewalrus, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 12:47 (4304 days ago) @ Brian A

Looks like they created a camel or some other odd critter.

I think that's cool!

by Boge Quinn, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 09:00 (4304 days ago) @ Hoot

:-)

I think that is UGLY as sin...

by Rob Leahy ⌂ @, Prescott, Arizona, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 09:54 (4304 days ago) @ Hoot

But that's just me...

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops

Rob, you're not ugly as sin!

by Boge Quinn, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 09:56 (4304 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

:-P

Just add a rail and bigger grip and you have THIS:

by brionic @, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 10:36 (4304 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

[image]


Leather is extra.

I prefer the Colt. The ejector shroud treatment is fancy.

I agree with Rob...

by FOG, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 13:38 (4304 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

ALL revolvers should have rails.

:-D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Obligatory Disclaimer (aka, 'Fine' Print): This coming from a guy who put a [*GASP*] Dot Sight on a K22...

--
[image]

And now, for something completely different...

by Cherokee @, Medina, Ohio, Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 11:33 (4304 days ago) @ Hoot

Not for me...

RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum